Welcome back to Decouple, the best source for cutting-edge analysis on nuclear energy, with weekly interviews by Chris Keefer. Watch on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple.
Today, we talk uranium nuclear fuel.
I spoke with MIT's Professor Koroush Shirvan, who rejoins me after our first interview on Small Modular Reactors. Now, we dive into the hidden complexities of nuclear fuels. From early fuel experiments that saw uranium rods turn into spaghetti-like structures under neutron bombardment to the intricate economics shaping the future of fuels like TRISO, Shirvan offers clear insights into the realities behind nuclear power’s remarkable yet challenging fuel technologies.
Read on and listen to discover how history shaped today's dominant fuel choices, why accident-tolerant innovations are critical, and about the economic realities that could either launch or limit the nuclear renaissance.
Watch now on YouTube.
We talk about
Extraordinary energy density of nuclear fuels compared to fossil fuels
Evolution from unstable uranium metal fuels to stable ceramics like uranium oxide
Complex transmutation occurring within nuclear fuel rods
Dominance of uranium oxide fuel in global reactors
Importance and challenges of zirconium-based cladding
Extensive time required for developing and qualifying new nuclear fuels
Economics and rising costs of fuel enrichment, especially for High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU)
Detailed exploration of TRISO fuel, its benefits, and high manufacturing costs
Comparative fuel cost analysis: CANDU, LWR, TRISO, and natural gas
Impact of enrichment and fabrication capabilities on nuclear fuel economics
Deeper Dive
Nuclear fuels have always benefitted from staggering energy density. The original promise of uranium—70,000 times more energy per kilogram compared to natural gas—is compelling. Yet, Professor Shirvan reminds us that practical limitations significantly erode this advantage. Uranium's complexity, from mining through enrichment and encapsulation, strips away much of this initial promise. Even so, the sheer energy density remains unmatched.
Historically, nuclear fuels evolved from metallic uranium to ceramic forms because metals simply couldn’t withstand the intense neutron bombardment. Early experiments produced disturbing results—uranium rods swelling into "spaghetti-like" shapes after mere days. Hence, ceramics like uranium oxide emerged, stable enough to handle harsh reactor conditions and chemically inert in air or water exposure.
"Historically, uranium oxide fuel emerged because metallic uranium turned into spaghetti under neutron bombardment." – Koroush Shirvan
Zirconium alloys became the standard for cladding due to their neutron transparency. Yet, these materials are not without issues, particularly in accident scenarios where they can rapidly oxidize and fail. Shirvan stresses the ongoing importance of developing accident-tolerant fuels (ATFs). These ATFs could dramatically reduce risks by maintaining structural integrity longer under extreme conditions, buying crucial response time in emergencies.
TRISO fuel, which encapsulates uranium particles in ceramic layers, promises enhanced safety and higher operating temperatures. Shirvan outlines its early adoption in high-temperature gas reactors, its decline due to regulatory and economic barriers, and its current renaissance. Yet, TRISO's complexity—and resulting higher enrichment—drives costs up significantly. Without scale, it remains economically daunting.
Shirvan clarifies how enrichment levels exponentially impact fuel costs. High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) required by advanced reactors costs magnitudes more, largely because of strict regulatory safeguards and limited production facilities. This financial barrier starkly contrasts with natural gas, despite uranium’s theoretical energy density advantage.
"When you go above 10% enrichment, you're looking at a different category of operation classification. And so what that means is that you have to have different form of quality assurance related to safeguards of this material." - Koroush Shirvan
Looking ahead, Shirvan sees potential yet realism. Optimistically, with substantial investment, TRISO costs could be reduced, becoming competitive at scale. Realistically, however, he acknowledges considerable uncertainty—investment risks, prolonged regulatory timelines, and market inertia might stymie rapid progress. Nuclear's economic future thus hinges precariously on decisions made today about fuels, infrastructure, and innovation.
"Economics will ultimately determine nuclear’s future—innovation must drive down costs or it won’t survive." – Koroush Shirvan
Watch Koroush Shirvan’s previous interview on Decouple.
Small Reactors Are Bulking Up
Timestamps
00:00 Introduction
03:05 Historical Evolution and Energy Density
09:44 Chemistry and Complexity of Nuclear Fuel
14:15 Why Uranium Oxide Dominates
21:09 Fuel Cladding Explained
29:23 Accidents and Fuel Failures
35:24 Challenges in Fuel Development
40:41 TRISO Fuel: Past, Present, and Potential
50:30 Economics of HALEU
01:05:37 Comparative Costs and Future Realities
Keywords
Nuclear fuels, Uranium oxide, Zirconium cladding, Accident-tolerant fuels (ATF), TRISO particles, High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), Nuclear economics, Fuel enrichment, Advanced reactors, Nuclear renaissance
Share this post